<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UX Strategy and Planning &#187; selection set</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uxstrategy.net/tag/selection-set/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uxstrategy.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In-Depth Interviews: Consideration Set, part 3</title>
		<link>http://www.uxstrategy.net/2009/10/retailer-selection-set-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uxstrategy.net/2009/10/retailer-selection-set-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selection set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualfloorspace.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another exercise that helps discover attributes that pull retailers into the consideration set for a given product type involves filling out a table with a list of the attributes most likely to differentiate retailers in that category and ask customers to rate several retailers on these attributes. As a simple example, you could ask customers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another exercise that helps discover attributes that pull retailers into the consideration set for a given product type involves filling out a table with a list of the attributes most likely to differentiate retailers in that category and ask customers to rate several retailers on these attributes. As a simple example, you could ask customers to fill out an evaluation of retailer attributes using the following worksheet. (SA: Strongly agree; A: Agree; N: Neutral; D: Disagree; SD: Strongly disagree)</p>
<ul>
<li>Convenient</li>
<li>Simple</li>
<li>Cost saving</li>
<li>Easy to find products/services</li>
<li>Easy to check out</li>
<li>Easy to get details</li>
<li>Provides help when needed</li>
<li>Has the products or services I’m looking for</li>
<li>Great customer service</li>
<li>Great online experience</li>
</ul>
<p>Based on these ratings, the user experience design strategy should include guidance about how to achieve differentiation for a given user type using design components. Most retailers have much more detailed quantitative data about differentiators, but they are usually aggregated such that its difficult to target these findings to a given type of customer or persona. This kind of module helps bridge that gap, although a follow-up quantitative exercise may be needed to drive out more comprehensive findings that are representative or validated to the extent needed to guide user experience design of a high-traffic web site.</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 415px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Copyright 2009, Paul Bryan, Usography Corporation (http://www.usography.com)</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 415px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/uxexperts</div>
<p>Copyright 2009, Paul Bryan, Usography Corporation (<a href="http://www.usography.com" target="_blank">http://www.usography.com</a>)</p>
<p>Linked In: <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/uxexperts" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/uxexperts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uxstrategy.net/2009/10/retailer-selection-set-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In-Depth Interviews: The Retailer Selection Set, part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.uxstrategy.net/2009/10/in-depth-interviews-the-retailer-selection-set-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uxstrategy.net/2009/10/in-depth-interviews-the-retailer-selection-set-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-retail design strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selection set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualfloorspace.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To understand the competitive set of each participant, ask them to list the competitive sources of products or information related to the topic you are researching. Ask them to describe: The relative value of each source Likes and dislikes of each source Successful and unsuccessful interactions with competitive sources Experience using similar or competitive web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To understand the competitive set of each participant, ask them to list the competitive sources of products or information related to the topic you are researching. Ask them to describe:</p>
<ul>
<li>The relative value of each source</li>
<li>Likes and dislikes of each source</li>
<li>Successful and unsuccessful interactions with competitive sources</li>
<li>Experience using similar or competitive web sites</li>
<li>Rating of your site vs. competitive sites based on specific criteria</li>
</ul>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>As a result of the competitive set module, you should have obtained:</p>
<ul>
<li>List of competitive sites</li>
<li>Positive and negative aspects of competition</li>
<li>Ratings to compare across participants</li>
<li>Competitive benchmark in terms of design and/or functionality</li>
<li>Opportunities to reach parity or superiority</li>
</ul>
<h5>Sample script:</h5>
<ul>
<li>When did you first start planning your last stay in a vacation resort?</li>
<li>When you started planning, which companies were you considering staying with?</li>
<li>Why did you include each of these?</li>
<li>Which companies did you leave out of this list? Why?</li>
<li>Are there any companies that you wish you would have included in this process? If yes, which one(s)?</li>
<li>Are there any companies you wish you would have left out of this process? If yes, which one(s)?</li>
<li>Which web sites did you visit?</li>
<li>Which web sites did you know about but not visit? Why?</li>
</ul>
<p>Copyright 2009, Paul Bryan, Usography Corporation (<a href="http://www.usography.com" target="_blank">http://www.usography.com</a>)</p>
<p>Linked In: <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/uxexperts" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/uxexperts</a></p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 651px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Copyright 2009, Paul Bryan, Usography Corporation (www.usography.com)</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 651px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/uxexperts</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uxstrategy.net/2009/10/in-depth-interviews-the-retailer-selection-set-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

